America s corporate art christensen jerome. UC Irvine 2019-01-27

America s corporate art christensen jerome Rating: 8,6/10 552 reviews

UC Irvine

america s corporate art christensen jerome

The E-mail message field is required. Simply, Christensen wants to make his case for the corporation as the auteur — not the director or producer. Practicing Enlightenment: Hume and the Formation of a Literary Career Wisconsin: 1987. Christensen's work is an impressive effort to bridge the gap between economic and aesthetic film history. Christensen relies on the corporation as the organization fed by the studio. This makes the book read like a series of essays more than one coherent historical analysis.

Next

America’s Corporate Art, Jerome Christensen • book review

america s corporate art christensen jerome

That is Hollywood has always shared a small number of owners, and a single, continuous style. Contrary to theories of single person authorship, America's Corporate Art argues that the corporate studio is the author of Hollywood motion pictures, both during the classical era of the studio system and beyond, when studios became players in global dramas staged by massive entertainment conglomerates. Frederick Burwick Ohio State: 1988. Harold Bloom Chelsea House: 1986. The book concludes with an analysis of the Disney-Pixar merger and the first two Toy Story movies in light of the recent extension of the First Amendment rights of corporation.

Next

America's Corporate Art

america s corporate art christensen jerome

The basis of the Bordwell, Staiger and Thompson book is a random sample of movies and seeks to document collective traits. Series Title: Responsibility: Jerome Christensen. Epstein Purdue University Press, 1991. Contrary to theories of single person authorship, America's Corporate Art argues that the corporate studio is the author of Hollywood motion pictures, both during the classical era of the studio system and beyond, when studios became players in global dramas staged by massive entertainment conglomerates. The book concludes with an analysis of the Disney-Pixar merger and the first two Toy Story movies in light of the recent judicial extension of constitutional rights of the corporate person.

Next

America's Corporate Art : The Studio Authorship of Hollywood Motion Pictures (1929

america s corporate art christensen jerome

Abstract: Contrary to theories of single person authorship, America's Corporate Art argues that the corporate studio is the author of Hollywood motion pictures, both during the classical era of the studio system and beyond, when studios became players in global dramas staged by massive entertainment conglomerates. No other author has analyzed studio authorship with the depth, care, and complexity that Christensen exhibits here, nor has such an argument been supported with close readings of individual films. Bialostosky and Needham, Indiana Univ. Its first word in the title should be Hollywood — as a set of corporations, now owned as multinational companies. Most puzzling is that Christensen dismisses The Classical Hollywood Cinema, by David Bordwell, Janet Staiger, and Kirsten Thompson.

Next

America's Corporate Art : the Studio Authorship of Hollywood Motion Pictures (1929

america s corporate art christensen jerome

Benito-Vessels and Zappala Delaware: 1992. In contrast, Christensen offers up seven chapters — cherry picked — that make up this book read like a series of essays. Harold Bloom Chelsea House: 1986. Coleridge's Blessed Machine of Language Cornell: 1981. The E-mail message field is required. Finally, the book is mis-titled. The book covers the history of corporate authorship through the antithetical visions of two of the most dominant Hollywood studios, Warner Bros.

Next

America’s Corporate Art, Jerome Christensen • book review

america s corporate art christensen jerome

If corporations insist on being treated as persons with rights in the eyes of the law, Christensen argues, then let criticism follow suit. Jerome Christensen tries to walk tightrope between the corporate world of Hollywood and the literary authorship through contrasting only two of the Hollywood studios, Warner Bros. He washes over different organizations that make pictures that have different objectives and meanings, not mere differences in style — a truth that cannot be deduced from a flow chart or a biography of an executive, or a table of revenues, or a theoretical model of the development of capitalism. The book concludes with an analysis of the Disney-Pixar merger and the first two Toy Story movies in light of the recent judicial extension of constitutional rights of the corporate person. The book covers the history of corporate authorship through the antithetical visions of two of the most dominant Hollyw.

Next

UC Irvine

america s corporate art christensen jerome

Christensen's work is an impressive effort to bridge the gap between economic and aesthetic film history. If corporations insist on being treated as persons with rights in the eyes of the law, Christensen argues, then let criticism follow suit. Miniver and Battleground 1940-1949 ; 3. Lord Byron's Strength: Romantic Writing and Commercial Society, Johns Hopkins: 1992. Christensen's work is an impressive effort to bridge the gap between economic and aesthetic film history.

Next

America's Corporate Art : The Studio Authorship of Hollywood Motion Pictures (1929

america s corporate art christensen jerome

The book covers the history of corporate authorship through the antithetical visions of two of the most dominant Hollyw. Hollywood movies are examples of a commodity that, until the digital age, was rare: a self-advertising artifact that markets the studio's brand in the very act of consumption. America's Corporate Art is an extended exercise in holding corporations responsible for their utterances. Hollywood movies are examples of a commodity that, until the digital age, was rare: a self-advertising artifact that markets the studio's brand in the very act of consumption. No other author has analyzed studio authorship with the depth, care, and complexity that Christensen exhibits here, nor has such an argument been supported with close readings of individual films. America's Corporate Art is an extended exercise in holding corporations responsible for their utterances. Hollywood has always dominated the rest of the Americas — North, Central and South.

Next

America's Corporate Art : Jerome Christensen : 9780804778633

america s corporate art christensen jerome

Jac Tharpe Mississippi: 1980 , pp. But this ignores cinema distribution and presentation. Sadly, Corporate Art does not recognize that Hollywood corporations include the studio only as part of the portion of larger corporations. America's Corporate Art is an extended exercise in holding corporations responsible for their utterances. Hollywood movies are examples of a commodity that, until the digital age, was rare: a self-advertising artifact that markets the studio's brand in the very act of consumption. .

Next

America's corporate art : the studio authorship of Hollywood motion pictures (Book, 2012) [blueshirtsunited.com]

america s corporate art christensen jerome

Ownership and Authorship: Warners' Fountainhead and Hitchcock's Vertigo 1949-1958 ; 5. Author: Jerome Christensen Publisher: Palo Alto : Stanford University Press, 2012. With the phrase corporate studio, Christensen includes just those Hollywood production sides of movie companies — and ignores world-wide distribution and national theatrical chains. Lord Byron: Modern Critical Views, ed. Harold Bloom Chelsea House: 1986 , pp. For Christensen — a literary trained scholar — individual movies are understood as corporate behavior and must be restored to the social, economic, and political environment in which they competed and generate popularity and thus revenues to maximize profits. The book covers the history of corporate authorship through the antithetical visions of two of the most dominant Hollywood studios, Warner Bros.

Next